The student news site of Stillwater Area High School

Trump’s Cabinet choices already worrying

January 9, 2017

President-elect Trump’s cabinet choices in the recent weeks have been controversial to say the least.

Whether it’s appointing a blatantly sexist media executive to be his top adviser, appointing a medical doctor with no experience in government or housing as the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, or appointing an opponent of environmental regulation to the head of the EPA, Trump has a unique way of scaring the public while building an administration.

Among the first of Trump’s appointees was also one of the most heavily criticized. To be his senior advisor, Trump chose Steve Bannon.  Best known for his news website Breitbart, Bannon is a major figurehead for the alt-right political movement.  The alt-right is notorious for its sexism, racism and anti-semitism, and Bannon has been shown to hold those ideals closely to his heart.  

His website Breitbart has exemplified Bannon’s prejudices well, with headlines like “Bill Kristol: Republican Spoiler, Renegade Jew”, “The Solution to Online ‘Harassment’ is Simple Women Should Log Off”, “Hoist it high and proud: The Confederate Flag Proclaims a Glorious Heritage” and quite possibly the headline most representative of this joke of a news source, one horrible rhetorical question, “Would You Rather Your Child Had Feminism or Cancer”.

When a media executive such as Bannon is in charge of such a hateful, incendiary publication it stands to reason that he would take his horrible values to the white house if given the opportunity, and sadly, Trump has provided this opportunity.  

I think Trump has shown that he will put America first, will protect the economy above all else.”

— Noah Schraut

Bannon may have helped run Trump’s winning campaign, and he may have been successful in the world of business, but those qualities don’t outshine the irreparable damage this man has done to the world by spreading such hateful ideals.

Another controversial pick by Trump was the man he chose to nominate as the Secretary of Housing and Urban development, a neurosurgeon by the name of Dr. Ben Carson.  Not only has he become well know in the field of medicine, but he also gained some political attention as an opponent of Trump in the Republican primaries.  Many people may be surprised, and maybe a little concerned that our president elect has appointed someone with no actual experience in the government, and whose only experience in housing and urban development is that he lived in an urban, low income area as a child, to be the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and you would be right to be concerned, because it doesn’t really make sense.  

In an interview with the Hill in early November Armstrong Williams, a close friend of Carson was asked about his thoughts on why Carson had previously turned down an unspecified, but larger role in the Trump administration. “Dr Carson feels he has no government experience, he’d never run a federal agency,” he said.  “The last thing he would want to do was take a position that could cripple the presidency.”  With all of this being said Trump has still made his plans to give Carson this position very clear.

One of the most terrifying choices that Trump has made thus far is the appointment of Scott Pruitt to the head of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  Pruitt is the Attorney General of Oklahoma and at first glance that shows some positives that many of his appointees don’t have, namely experience in a government position, but the benefits to choosing this man stop there.  Pruitt has been a very outspoken opponent of the EPA, he has even called himself  “a leading advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda.” an odd position to take for someone who could very well be the head of the entire agency very soon.

Trump has shown us that he may choose wealth over qualification when it comes to other things.”

— Mya Lysne

The top issue that many americans have with Pruit is his stance on climate change, and it’s not about how he wants to solve it, but that he questions the existence of climate change all together.  Climate change is an issue that virtually every single reputable scientist in the United States acknowledges, and 97 percent believe that it is a direct effect of human activity, and they can point to countless studies to strengthen their argument, but for Pruitt that isn’t enough, publicly saying the debate on climate change is “far from settled”.  Pruitt uses that belief to speak out against environmental regulation and even at one point suing the EPA over their clean power plan.  So the question must be asked, why would we appoint one of an organization’s most vocal opponents to its top position?  This is a question our president elect won’t be able to answer.

There is only one rational that Trump and his supporters can cling to to legitimize these picks, the “pro-business” ideology that many republicans boast.  When Ben Carson ran for president, he advertised his pro-business plan by planning on implementing a flat tax of 14.9 percent, hoping to put more money in the pockets of rich business men.  Similarly, Scott Pruitt was notorious for fighting any form of government regulation as Oklahoma’s Attorney General, and looking at Bannon, a successful media executive, the connection to business isn’t hard to make.  Junior Noah Schraut understands this perspective, saying “I think Trump has shown that he will put America first, will protect the economy above all else.”

What people forget, is that blind support of business can end up having adverse effects on a country’s environment, freedom of opportunity for those who aren’t born into wealth, and overall standard of living.  At that point we must realise that when economic growth impedes on our health and other basic rights, that economic development becomes contrary to the very goal of the american economy, the goal of prosperity, happiness, and a high quality of life for all.  Sophomore Mya Lysne sees this flaw in Trump’s picks, saying ” Trump has shown us that he may choose wealth over qualification when it comes to other things.”

Many of these choices still need to be reviewed and approved, but the fact that these are the options our president elect is giving us is worrying to say the least.  If the decisions that Trump is making on who he wants in his administration are this troubling, how can we expect his decision making to improve on policy and diplomacy?  Sadly the answer to this question is as simple as it is abysmal, we can’t.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

10 Comments

10 Responses to “Trump’s Cabinet choices already worrying”

  1. Anna Koenning on January 15th, 2017 8:12 pm

    Great article! I like that it provides plenty of solid, non-biased information as well as opinions. The links were very helpful, and they added a lot to the story without lengthening it. There is a good flow between topics, beginning with a shocking cabinet choice and ending in the worst. Good job!

    [Reply]

  2. Kevin Thole on January 17th, 2017 12:32 pm

    I thought that this was a very good analysis of Trump’s picks. You pointed out some major flaws in the choices and the article seemed very well researched. Your writing style had very good flow that connected the topics.

    [Reply]

  3. Christian Anderson on January 17th, 2017 8:42 pm

    Had good flow between body paragraphs, but the intro paragraph/sentence just felt a little weak. It didn’t really entice me to continue on the story, but your nut graph made it up. Really good use of quotes too. In general work on stronger leads/intros.

    [Reply]

  4. lauren gella on January 18th, 2017 12:26 pm

    I thought the use of unique vocabulary was a great way for the author to show he really knows what he is talking about and how he expressed his opinion. I love the topic and the headline because anything having to do with Trump usually draws readers in because all of the controversy having to do with this recent election.

    [Reply]

  5. Cates Eliasen on January 20th, 2017 10:23 am

    Eloquently written in a way that showcases very intelligent arguments. Your opinion stays very clear and obvious throughout the article. It is easy to see how you feel about each of the cabinet members and why and that adds an element to the article that makes it a thrilling read. Great article!

    [Reply]

  6. Noah Ness on February 7th, 2017 11:25 am

    This article was very well written, and it was obvious that you had done a lot of research on the topic. You backed up your claims with evidence, and the whole story flowed very nicely.

    [Reply]

  7. McKenzie Bohlig on February 9th, 2017 8:42 pm

    This article is very well done. There is a clear point stance on the topic in the article however it is not offensive to the opposing view point. There is obviously a good amount of research that was put into this and every point is backed up with a fact. There are a few spelling/ grammatical errors but overall it is one of the best political articles I’ve read all year.

    [Reply]

  8. Megan Ramberg on February 9th, 2017 9:21 pm

    What I really like about this article specifically is how clear your opinion is throughout, yet still remains informational and not excessively biased; your opinion doesn’t cloud the facts you used in the article.

    [Reply]

  9. Noah Johnson on February 9th, 2017 9:42 pm

    Exceptionally written article. Quite clearly points out why Trump’s cabinet picks are controversial. I liked that both views were shown on his picks. Caught my eye because of recent talks on news channels about the issue.

    [Reply]

  10. Abby Banks on February 9th, 2017 10:31 pm

    This article was great! The opinion was very strong, and was backed up sufficiently with evidence. The research done and passion about the subject really came through!

    [Reply]

The Pony Express intends for this area to be used to foster healthy thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to the standards of the Pony Express and to be respectful and constructive. Furthermore, we do not permit any of the following inappropriate content including: Libel or defamatory statements, any copyrighted, trademarked, or intellectual property of others, the use of profanity and foul language or personal attacks. All comments are reviewed and approved by staff to ensure that they meet the standards of this publication. The Pony Express does not allow anonymous comments. We require a name and valid email address submitted. This email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments. Online comments that are found in violation of these policies will be removed as quickly as possible.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




The Pony Express • Copyright 2017 • FLEX WordPress Theme by SNOLog in