Trump administration rolls out controversial new sexual assault policy

Reprinted+with+permission+from+Jack+Lange

Reprinted with permission from Jack Lange

Hannah Boardman, Print EIC

In politics today, sexual assault is a controversial topic. There have been debates over what counts as substantial evidence, with the two options being preponderance of evidence or clear and convincing evidence. The Obama-era administration set the standard of preponderance of evidence. Over the past month, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has rescinded that policy in favor of clear and convincing evidence.

Sexual assault is a delicate topic, and the guidelines set forth by the Trump administration make the debate even harder, with more rigid standards of evidence. The new policy makes it more difficult for students to get the help they need, and may push people away from reporting an act of sexual violence against them.

According to the Cornell Law School, the preponderance of evidence standard is, “a requirement that more then 50 percent of the evidence points to something” whereas the clear and convincing evidence is, “a more rigorous standard to meet than the preponderance of the evidence standard, but a less rigorous standard to meet than proving evidence beyond a reasonable doubt” in which “a party must prove that it is substantially more likely than not that it is true.”

“[The new policy] makes me feel…less prepared to go to college, knowing that if something does happen to me it’s going to be harder to make the person who committed such an act receive their consequences…and that to me is a really unsettling feeling,” explains senior Grace Luloff.

With more people going to college every year, a new sexual assault policy is surprising. College freshmen can be  impressionable, with little practical knowledge of the outside world. Young adults may not know the warning signs of a sexual predator, or the techniques to keep from falling victim to roofies and other under-the-radar drugs. Without this information, it makes it much easier for innocent students to fall victim, and not get the justice they deserve for this terrible crime.

According to Doug Anderson, Director of Communications and Media at Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, “At the colleges and universities of Minnesota State, the process through which individuals alleging sexual misconduct may pursue a complaint is defined under System Procedure 1B.3.1. This procedure states that investigations and disciplinary procedures concerning sexual violence must ‘be based on a preponderance of evidence standard.'”

Although the change in policy is strongly encouraged at all schools, schools are not required to change their own policies. In Minnesota State colleges and universities, they still adhere to the preponderance standard. This standard provides more assurance for the victim. Under the clear and convincing evidence standard, victims may be less likely to report acts since they may fear the long and oftentimes emotionally painful process. Young people ages 18-21 way not be emotionally ready after such a traumatic event, and may break down under the pressure of the law, causing them to abandon their case before they get the closure they deserve.

Despite the new policy making it harder for the victim to gain justice, it does help prevent unjust accusations. This is one of the goals of Betsy DeVos and the Trump administration, and the new evidence policy helps to protect those people.

The new system may make it easier to weed out the unfair allegations, but it also gives the advantage to the accused. In cases that may be just and fair, the accused may get off with little punishment, just because of the lack of evidence. Evidence in these cases is often difficult to produce, and with the new policy the accused may just benefit from that fact.

“Be very clear with what’s happening. A lot of girls have problems with communication…I think we should teach [girls] it’s okay to be blunt in a situation that could turn into something dangerous. If you do not want what’s happening, you need to say no,” advises Luloff.

The exact future of sexual assault policy is unknown, but with the newest updates, we should focus on our current and incoming college students and help them get the information they need, so that if anything does happen they are prepared. The only preemptive defense against sexual assault is education; educating our students on how to treat other people and the meaning of consent, as well as what measures to take to make sure that they remain safe in risky situations.